erik lundegaard

WAR's Catcher Problem, Cont.

I wrote about this a few months ago when I noticed that WAR ranked 3.5 years of Mike Trout higher than 12 years of Yadier Molina. I also noticed that the top WAR ranking for any catcher in baseball history (Johnny Bench, yo) was 48th. Seemed off. 

I finally decided to run the numbers to see if WAR undervalued any other position. Here's Baseball Reference's tops at each. Excuse the lack of baseball diamond, but I couldn't find a good writable source online:

All-time team by position based on Baseball Refrence WAR

Initially, the corners are a bit undervalued but it's still mostly the backstop. In fact, before we get the best catcher in baseball history, we get the following:

  • 7 first basemen
  • 6 second basemen
  • 7 shortstops
  • 8 third basemen
  • 19 outfielders

And if you add in pitchers?

  • 27 pitchers

Meaning instead of the best catcher in baseball history being the 48th best player in baseball history, which is bad enough, he's actually the 75th. Every other position has at least six representatives before Johnny Bench is called onto the field. This, even though catcher is generally regarded as the toughest position in baseball. 

FanGraphs' version of WAR, on their clunky site, isn't much better. It has Bench as the 42nd-best position player. I can't even calculate it with pitchers. 

Thoughts, baseball fans?

Johnny Bench WAR catcher

Looks easy. 

Tags: , ,
Posted at 06:20 AM on Fri. Aug 28, 2015 in category Baseball  

COMMENTS

« Did Neocons, Gun Nuts, Watch Too Many Cartoons as Kids?   |   Home   |   Summer Box Office: Winners, Losers, Lessons »
 RSS    Facebook

Twitter: @ErikLundegaard

ARCHIVES
LINKS