erik lundegaard

Spider-Man 4 No More!

We got the news yesterday, via Nikki Finke's site, that Sam Raimi walked away from “Spider-Man 4” because he couldn't deliver on the summer 2011 release date and didn't want to compromise the series' “creative integrity.” (Yeah, we know: “Spider-Man 3.”) With him went everything, including Toby Maguire and Kirsten Dunst, and now Sony's planning a reboot with a new director and a new Peter Parker/Spider-Man. And 3-D. The fall-out from the success of “Avatar,” I guess. Now every studio will be pushing 3-D the way that, after the success of Cameron's “Titanic,” every studio pushed movies with water. Because that was the obvious lesson of “Titanic” to them: People like water. So with “Avatar”: People like 3-D. They do, but within limits. “X Games 3D—The Movie” was hardly a hit in August, for example. “A Christmas Carol” did OK in November, $137 million, but 16 non-3-D films did better for the year. You need more than 3-D.

More to the point: A reboot? Of Spider-Man? The original wasn't even 8 years ago! Is that by how much we're speeding things up? By the time Warner Bros. rebooted the Batman franchise, four movies and 16 years had passed. By the time Sony reboots Spider-Man, three movies and 10 years will have passed. Do I hear two movies and 6 years? One movie and 3 years? Hey, let's keep telling the same story over and over and over again.

Oh wait, please don't tell me: Shia LeBeouf? No, can't be.

And this was a successful franchise—one of the most successful franchises of the '00s. The first movie had the highest domestic gross of 2002. The second had the second-highest domestic gross of 2004. The third had the highest domestic gross of 2007. Can't get much better than that.

One wonders what the creative conflict was—and how creative that conflict was. Or was the problem financial? Raimi supposedly wanted a $230 million budget. The L.A. Times also adds:

The studio said it would hire a new star and director and re-boot the movie as a story about Parker's early life as a “teenager grappling with contemporary human problems and amazing super-human crises.” Because Sony is essentially starting from scratch, the studio has pushed the picture's release to 2012.

“Contemporary” human problems? As opposed to the outdated problems he grappled with originally? Like love, death, guilt, shame?

Somewhere, Electro, the Scorpion, and Kraven the Hunter are sitting back down.


Posted at 05:43 PM on Tue. Jan 12, 2010 in category Movies  
Tags: ,

COMMENTS

Mister B wrote:

I also read somewhere that a movie studio is looking into rebooting the "Lord of the Rings" franchise -- by moving the whole story to New York City so that it's more contemporary.

The first one will be called "The Fellowship Of The Bling".

The second one will be called "Ents And The City" (because it's too soon to call it "The Twin Towers").

The third one will be called "The Return Of The White Castle".

I hope Raimi didn't ask for that kind of money because no one anywhere -- wearing any kind of baseball jersey (especially pinstripes) -- should make that kind of money (unless they also discover a cure for cancer AND at least three STDs) and I can't believe someone wants to reboot a series that started DURING THE LAST PRESIDENTIAL ADMINISTRATION!

Dumbasses.
Comment posted on Tue. Jan 12, 2010 at 11:25 PM

Tim wrote:

I read about this yesterday or the day before, and I'm with you -- one poor movie does not necessitate re-boot. "Batman" had several bad movies killing it over time. It feels like they're tossing 1 and 2 into the garbage heap just because 3 sucked.

Mike, I don't know that Raimi wanted to be paid that money so much as he wanted his film budget to be BIG. (Of course, I say that without having followed the link.)
Comment posted on Wed. Jan 13, 2010 at 08:41 AM

Erik wrote:

Mike, I altered the line to make it less ambivalent. He wanted the money for the movie, not himself.

Tim, I wouldn't be surprised if they tossed the franchise away for this reason: They have nowhere to go. They really had nowhere to go after 2. He got the girl, he was a hero. Where do you go from there?

I suppose they could think about children. Can they even have children? If so, will PP's spider-DNA alter them? Who can they ask? Tony Stark?

Not really the stuff of blockbusters.
Comment posted on Wed. Jan 13, 2010 at 09:53 AM

You may bypass the ID fields and security question below if you log in before commenting.


 
 





Receive notification of further comments via e-mail

« Review: “New Moon” (2009)   |   Home   |   The Disagreeables »
 RSS    Facebook

Twitter: @ErikLundegaard

ARCHIVES

All previous entries

LINKS
dative-querulous