erik lundegaard

Movie Review: To the Wonder (2013)

WARNING: SPOILERS

Is it thatís itís love? Is that the problem? Itís not taking a hill in war, itís not taking over a new world, itís not coming of age. Itís love. Blah blah love.

Is there anything more boring than two people in love? Who are so into each other that the rest of the world, including you and me, fall away? Cease to matter? I mean, dramatically speaking, the point of the love story is to keep the lovers apart for as long as possible. Because when theyíre together? Ick.

Terrence Malick doesnít do this. He begins ďTo the WonderĒ with the lovers together, and in love, and in fucking Paris for fuckís sake. He begins at the top of the heap. He begins with them heading out to Mont Saint Michel in Normandy off the coast of France. Itís a beautifully constructed island and thatís what they are.

Poster: To the WonderThese are the first words we hear, in French, from the unnamed Russian/Parisian Marina (Olga Kurylenko), who is in love with the unnamed American Neil (Ben Affleck):

Newborn
I open my eyes
I melt
Into the eternal light
I fall into the flame

We get shots of her skipping, and running from the camera, and twirling away from the camera. Thereís a constant lightness. Light kisses. Light touches. Trees dappled by sunlight. Then more fucking twirling.

I in you
You in me

Iím already bored with it. It feels like bad e.e. cummings to me.

Marinaís problem
I get it. Malick is interested in transitions, in new worlds. So to go along with the transition between life and death, between Europe and America, between youth and adulthood, he gives us the transition between being in love and seeing the world anew (in Europe), and then falling out of love and back to Earth (in Texas or Oklahoma).

But it doesnít resonate. Because itís love or because itís latter-day Malick? Latter-day Malick seems to have given up on dialogue, on specificity of story. By denying specifics, is he trying to create universality? By denying dialogue, is he saying to the only true life is the inner life?

I mean, what is the problem for Marina and Neil? What is the story?

They meet in Paris, fall in love, move to America with her middle-school aged daughter Tatiana (Tatiana Chiline). At first, Tatiana loves it all. Sheís like her mother. They dance through the grocery aisles. ďEverything is beautiful here,Ē she says in the grocery store. ďLook how clean it is!Ē CUT TO: Neil, a kind of environmental engineer, measuring levels of toxicity in the soil. Thereís lead; thereís cadmium. People are getting sick and dying. Thatís the secret of America: It looks clean but itís not.

Then Tatiana goes to school. She doesnít like it. Sheís a cute French girl with a cute French accent but she doesnít fit in. We see girls talking, doing cartwheels, and then Tatiana is complaining she has no friends. ďWe need to leave,Ē she tells her mother. ďBoth of us. Thereís something missing.Ē Can she not do cartwheels? Is that the problem?

And what of Neil? Letís talk of Neil. Who the fuck is Neil? Neil is basically Malick, since this story is based upon Malickís 1980s romance with MichŤle Morette, but he gives himself short shrift here. We get all the thoughts twirling through Marinaís little head but little of what Neil is thinking or feeling. Sheís light, heís heavy. Sheís a ballerina, heís a bear. She represents the evanescence of love, he representsówhether Malick intended it or notósomething more stolid.

Thatís the thing. The movie is about the inability to hold onto this feeling, this love, whether itís the love between a man and a woman or between a man and God. Hereís what Father Quintana (Javier Bardem), who is losing his faith, tells his parish:

There is love that is like a stream that can go dry when rain no longer feeds it. But there is a love that is like a spring coming up from the earth. The first is human love, the second is divine love and has its source above.

Thatís what we strive for: the love that is like a spring coming up from the earth: constant.

Neil actually kind of embodies this. Doesnít he? At the least, he never seems too deeply in love and thus never seems to fall too deeply out of love. Itís Marina who goes from twirling through all the delights of the world to trashing the house.

Neilís problem
Neil has a different problem, also articulated by Father Quintana, who tells his parish the following. Itís the most meaningful part of the movie for me since I felt myself in the words:

To choose is to commit yourself. And to commit yourself is to run the risk of failure, the risk of sin, the risk of betrayal. But Jesus can deal with all of those. Forgiveness he never denies us. The man who makes a mistake can repent. But the man who hesitates, who does nothing, who buries his talent in the earth, with him he can do nothing.

Thatís beautiful. Thatís enlightening. And itís Neil. Heís the one who hesitates. Marinaís visa is about to expire, he needs to marry her, but he hesitates and she returns to France.

You know what? I was kind of relieved. I thought, ďOK, maybe now weíll get a story.Ē No such luck. Neil falls into it with Jane (Rachel McAdams), an old high school flame, who has a ranch but lost a daughter, and they do the love thing for 15 minutes (voiceovers, magic-hour light, fields of wheat), before Marina contacts Neil again and returns. And there goes Jane. What was the point of her?

Now Neil and Marina get married in a courthouse. Now Neil and Marina get married in a church. With Father Quintana? No. His story is still separate, an echo of theirs. The lovers move into a new ranch house. They try to rekindle the wonder. Does it work? Will they get some furniture? It doesnít work. They donít get furniture.

She has a beautiful, loud Italian friend (Romina Mondello), who teaches her to be crazy and loud. She meets a carpenter, an echo of Neil, with whom she has an affair at an EconoLodge. The story is unspecific but the places are very specific. Malick does that well. He does America wellólike Nabokov in ďLolita.Ē Flat lands and big sky and loud marching bands and the screech of roller coasters.

Donít get me wrong. The film is shot beautifully. Itís gorgeous and deep. But the story in the foreground is gorgeous and shallow.

My problem
So their love dries up. Itís a stream that goes dry. Earlier Father Quintana says this:

You fear your love has died; perhaps it is waiting to be transformed into something higher. Awaken the divine presence which sleeps in each man, each woman. Know each other in that love that never changes.

Thatís what these characters are striving for: the thing that never changes. But of course it keeps changing. Where did they think they were? Where does Malick think he is? How old is he anyway?

This is what Father Quintana says of God:

Everywhere You are present and still I cannot see You.

Thatís how I felt about ďTo the Wonder.Ē Malick was present in every frame but I could never see his point.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Posted at 09:24 AM on Thu. Aug 22, 2013 in category Movie Reviews - 2013  

COMMENTS

« Movie Review: Lee Daniels' The Butler (2013)   |   Home   |   Quote of the Day »
 RSS    Facebook

Twitter: @ErikLundegaard

ARCHIVES
LINKS
dative-querulous