erik lundegaard

Jordy's Reviews: The Hunger Games (2012)

Jordy, my 10-year-old nephew, has beaten me to the punch! Here's his review of the mega-hit “The Hunger Games.” Mine, limping along, goes up tomorrow, most likely...

This movie has got to be one of the most insanely hyped movies ever. About five kids at my school stayed up until 12:00 to watch the premiere, isnít that insane?

Well, was it good? Yes, yes it was. The story† is about a girl named Katniss whose sister is chosen to compete in a fight to the death on live TV, and she volunteers for her.† Next is the acting. Jennifer Lawrence was good as Katniss, although there was one scene where I thought she overacted a bit. Josh Hutcherson was really good, too. Actually, the entire cast was great! This was not just a cast that said, ďGive me the money. Screw the acting.Ē

Poster for "The Hunger Games" (2012)Next is the movieís rating. Some people thought it shouldíve been rated R. I totally disagree. I mean, I was scared when I came in, but Gary Ross censored it well. There even was a scene where I got scared and went to the bathroom, mostly because I needed to go to the bathroom, but my friend, Finn, said ďOh, a tribute just died, no big deal.Ē Ross could have just done a Michael Bay and done, explosions, explosions, explosions, but no, he decided to censor it so young adults could see it and he could earn twice the money. Brilliant, Gary Ross!

The choreography was good, and did well to seem like people did train for a while to fight to the death on live TV. You will care for the characters that the movie wants you to care about, and you will hate the characters that the movie wants you to hate. In fact, my only real problem with the movie was the camera. No, not with the shaky camera effect for a realer movie, Iím talking about the action scenes. In most of them, they go for a closer effect, and go right up to the action, and I canít tell whatís going on. Plus, they could have tried to make the ending less sequel-ish. You donít get special exceptions cause almost everybody has read the book, you still have to act like youíre concluding it, not earning triple the money because you have 3 books and donít want to fit them into one. (Unless they pull a Harry Potter 7 or Twilight Breaking Dawn.)

But this is a great movie that I recommend you go see before they run out of tickets.

93%† Okay For 11+† ( Comment on what you want me to review next, and Iíll try to. Thanks!)

Tags: ,

Posted at 07:36 AM on Sun. Mar 25, 2012 in category Jordy's Reviews  

COMMENTS

Dana wrote:

Jordy! What an awesome review! I'm taking my girls to see it tonight for our last fun event while we're in Florida on spring break! We were thinking about staying up til 12:00 to see the premiere but I agreed with you that it was insane to do that! Keep up the great reviews, Jordy!

Comment posted on Sun. Mar 25, 2012 at 08:33 AM

Katy wrote:

Nice review Jordy! I'll show it to my 13-year old who devoured the books last year, and is anxious to see the movie. Actually, she's more eager to see it than me--I just don't like violence. Maybe I'll go to the bathroom at strategic moments too (and because I'll just need to go).

Comment posted on Sun. Mar 25, 2012 at 09:53 AM
« The Reviewing Games   |   Home   |   Odds Ever in 'Hunger Games's Favor: Grosses $155 Million Opening Weekend »
 RSS    Facebook

Twitter: @ErikLundegaard

ARCHIVES
LINKS
dative-querulous