erik lundegaard

 RSS    Facebook
ARCHIVES
By Category
General
Baseball
Biking
Books
Business
Culture
Hiking
Jean Gabin
Jordy’s Reviews
Lancelot Links
The Media
Microsoft
Movies
Movies - Box Office
Movies - Foreign
Movies - The Oscars
Movies - Reviews
Movies - Reviews - 2010
Movies - Studios
Movies - Theaters
Movies - Trailers
Music
Personal Pieces
Politics
Quote of the Day
Robin Hood
J.D. Salinger
Seattle
Seattle Mariners
Superheroes
TV
Vietnam
What Liberal Hollywood?
Word Study
Yankees Suck
By Month
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008

All previous entries

LINKS
Movies
Roger Ebert
David Edelstein
Film Experience Blog
Patrick Goldstein
Dave Kehr
Large Ass Movie Blogs
Le Monde
Northwest Film Forum
James Rocchi
Jeffrey Wells
Politics
Eric Alterman
Hendrik Hertzberg
Clay Shirky
Andrew Sullivan
Tom Toles
Baseball
Rob Neyer
USS Mariner
Joe Posnanski
Friends
Deb Ellis
Andrew Engelson
Tim Harrison
Jessica Thompson
Uncle Vinny

Hulk smash New York Times!

Today the New York Times has a piece on the controversy surrounding the movie, The Incredible Hulk, which won't be released until June.

I'm not a big fan of these types of articles anyway. The star is bickering with X. The fan sites are saying Y. The first movie "flopped," even though it made over $130 million domestically. It's not "news," since it's not about something that's actually happened; it's just gossip and prediction. 

I would've let it all slide except for this line: "The monster was mute in Mr. [Ang] Lee’s film, but this one speaks, a nod to the campy 1978-82 television series that starred Bill Bixby and the bodybuilder Lou Ferrigno (resplendent in green body paint)."

First, the TV show wasn't really campy — the way that Adam West's "Batman" was campy. "The Incredible Hulk" took itself seriously. Parts of it, in retrospect, may appear campy, but that wasn't the intention.

More importantly, and correct me if I'm wrong (Tim), but what nod to the series? Ferrigno's Hulk didn't speak. The comic-book Hulk spoke, generally without articles or proper grammar, but he spoke. If this new Hulk speaks, it's a nod to the comic book not the TV show.


Posted at 03:06 PM on Thu. Apr 10, 2008 in category The Media, Movies, Superheroes  

COMMENTS

Tim wrote:

You are correct, sir. Ferrigno growled mightily, but his Hulk was incapable of forming words... The comic book Hulk, on the other hand, has had so many evolutions and backslides that any Hulk utterance from "Hulk SMASH!" to a dissertation on the nature of gamma radiation could be a "nod to the comics."

If they had wanted to be campy, Ferrigno's Hulk would have spoken. "Hulk smash," "Hulk angry," "Hulk crush little McGee," "Hulk only self-aware enough to know that name is Hulk, though that only what media call Hulk."
Comment posted on Thu. Apr 10, 2008 at 04:29 PM

Drew Sanders wrote:

The first movie may be considered a "flop" more because it failed to entertain than that it didn't make money.

Ang Lee is demonstrably a very good director, but he was absolutely the wrong choice to direct this movie. Considering the cast he had (Eric Bana, Jennifer Connelly, Sam Elliot, Nick Nolte) this film seems to have been more about the effects than the characters.

And what a sad story it was. Even treated seriously, this should have been a "fun" film, yet there was no sense of fun in this soap opera (except for Banner's last line, and that was delivered in Spanish).

I could be wrong, but I suspect that the Norton version will suffer from the same problems.

We'll see......
Comment posted on Mon. Apr 28, 2008 at 03:04 PM

You may bypass the security form if you log in before commenting.

:




« The most popular movies of all time are chick flicks   |   Home   |   Why movies that open in 2,000 theaters should be avoided »