Dana Stevens on 'Looper'
“Looper felt to me like a maddening near-miss: It posits an impossible but fascinating-to-imagine relationship—a face-to-face encounter between one’s present and future self, in which each self must account for its betrayal of the other—and then throws away nearly all the dramatic potential that relationship offers. If someone remakes Looper as the movie it could have been in, say, 30 years, will someone from the future please FedEx it back to me?”
--Dana Stevens in her Slate review, “Looper: Joseph Gordon-Levitt meets his future-self, and he’s Bruce Willis.” I agree with her, particularly on the above point (my review here), but we're in the minority. “Looper” is currently running at 93% on Rotten Tomatoes.
COMMENTS
You may bypass the ID fields and security question below if you log in before commenting.
Twitter: @ErikLundegaard
Tweets by @ErikLundegaardRank the Academy Award's Best Pictures: 1927-2013
Eurotrip 2014: Overwhelmed in Prague
Why Breitbart’s Big Hollywood Is Wrong About Almost Everything
Dawn of the Planet of the Apes
Transformers: Age of Extinction
The 100-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out the Window and Disappeared